statshawk

Comparison

Statshawk vs theOddsAPI, SportRadar, and nba_api — a side-by-side for evaluators.

Honest read

This page exists because every dev evaluates two or three options before committing to a sports-data layer. We'd rather lay it out ourselves than lose the conversation to a Reddit thread.

The short version: Statshawk is the shortest path to an LLM-grounded, normalized sports backend. If you want raw odds, use theOddsAPI. If you want enterprise data with hand-holding, use SportRadar. If you're single-league and don't mind scraping, nba_api is free.

Feature matrix

CapabilityStatshawktheOddsAPISportRadarnba_api
MCP server (LLM-native)✓ hosted, OAuth
REST normalized across leaguesNBA, MLB, NFL, NHL, soccer, NCAAonly oddsyes (paid)NBA only
AuthAPI key + OAuth (MCP)API keyAPI key + IP allowlistnone (scraper)
Pricing modelusage unitsper-month per-marketenterprise quotefree
Live game datayes (≤30 s scoreboard)n/a (odds only)yesyes (NBA Stats lag)
Statcast / pitch datayesyes (separate SKU)
Pre-computed analysis cards
Self-serve signup✗ (sales call)✓ (open source)
Time-to-first-curl< 60 s< 60 s1–2 weekslocal install
Time-to-first-MCP-call< 60 sn/an/an/a
Bring-your-own odds line✓ (?line=)n/a

When to pick which

What we are not

  • An odds aggregator — we accept a line as input, we don't publish them.
  • A real-time push service — REST polling only at v1.
  • A betting platform — we serve data; you build the app.
  • Officially licensed — for regulated use you'll want a tier-1 provider.

If you've tried us and one of these gaps is a blocker, email hello@statshawk.ai. We read everything.

On this page